Evidence-Based Design Still Evolving

Home / Evidence-based Design / Evidence-Based Design Still Evolving

10/15/2013

If you like this post, please share:

If you liked this post, please share:

Roger Ulrich's pioneering study, "View from a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery," which appeared in the journal Science in 1984 pretty much launched the evidence-based design research field. Twenty-nine years later, it is still one of the most widely referenced studies. Because it was good.

When The Center for Health Design did its first literature review in 1996, researchers found 80 credible studies that linked the design of the physical environment to outcomes. Eight years later, in 2004, there were 600. In 2008, the last time a comprehensive literature review was published by The Center, more than 1,200 studies were found.

Although a comprehensive literature review has not been done since 2008, there are more than 2,500 studies, whitepapers, and other evidence-based design tools in The Center's recently-launched Knowledge Repository.

Is quantity more important than quality? When will we have enough studies? Are the studies we have today good quality studies? I'm not sure.

The real challenge in the evolution of the science of evidence-based design is getting healthcare and design professionals to commit to using the eight-step EBD process -- the final step of which is to "measure post-occupancy performance results."

The conversation around evidence-based design has quieted since the EDAC program was launched in 2008. Does that mean it's less important? I don't think so. What do you think?

P.S. Please do me a favor -- if you liked this post and like this blog, please share it with others by sending them the link and/or post it on your Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook, etc. Also, don't forget to subscribe, so you'll get emails when new content is posted. Thanks!

Publishing Partner

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Margaret Fleming

11 years ago

I am tempted to say: Of course it is more important! and leave it at that. What I want to say is: since we the patients get the resulting design and have to live with it, what is actually IMPORTANT is our input. In writing and blogging about the patient experience, I keep searching for specifics about WHAT EVIDENCE is being used?

And if patient feedback questionnaires are part of the evidence, they have a long way to go before they get the real story.

Sara Marberry

11 years ago

Good point, Margaret. Many hospitals conduct focus groups and or utilize the feedback from Patient and Family Advisory Councils. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, for example, has several very strong PFACs that have provided valuable input into facility design.

Mark VanderKlipp, EDAC

11 years ago

EBD is as much about communicating to patients as it is the built environment. Patient satisfaction is all about reducing stressors - whether in the built environment or as a result of "not knowing": where do I need to be, by when, how do I prepare, how do I get there, etc.

Until EBD accommodates questions such as those, which to a patient are some of the most important, it will be incomplete. Just as the provider needs to look at the whole person, it's important for us as designers to consider the whole experience.

Sara Marberry

11 years ago

Mark, I believe the EBD process allows for getting feedback and input from patients. Wouldn't that fall under Steps 2 and, "Find sources for relevant evidence" and "Critically interpret relevant evidence"?

Margaret Fleming

11 years ago

What I'm hoping for is to hear "used."

What has patient input, even secondhand from nurses, really changed? For instance, a CA hospital I was in a year ago added a tall new addition blocking the view from the tiny rooms that the nurse told me had always been in demand because of the view. I suspect that when the addition was built, the press was already full of evidence of the healing power of actually seeing nature.

Sara Marberry

11 years ago

So true. What good is feedback if you don't use it?

Bill Coble

11 years ago

How do we assist the 1300+ professionals who are accredited convey within their organizations how to incorporate in their practice models? Having access to post occupancy tools that are automated along with more discussion like you have shared today.